Merck, the American based pharmaceutical giant, announced on January 19 it will settle class action suits in Canada connected to its controversial pain medication Vioxx.The company’s announcement, which comes five years after the firm settled similar claims in the US with a payment of over $4.5 Billion, indicates Merck will pay between $21 and 36.8 million to a group of affected Canadians, estimated by Mike Peerless, a lawyer involved in the case, as ranging between one and two thousand patients.But before the Canadian victims of Vioxx see any shares of the money Merck has agreed to pay, at least $10 million in fixed and legal costs will be deducted.The drug, withdrawn from the world market in 2004, had been promoted as a new “super aspirin”. But critics maintain Merck did not move quickly enough to end its sales after studies in 2000 suggested use of the blockbuster drug, which was eventually taken by more that 20 million patients, created elevated risks of cardiovascular problems and death.According to one estimate, over 55,000 deaths world wide were associated with Vioxx use. The drug generated huge revenues for Merck, which sold $2.5 billion worth of Vioxx each year until it was finally recalled.In BC, the UBC based Therapeutics Initiative was credited with saving over 600 lives by issuing an early warning about Vioxx dangers."This agreement is structured to provide certainty and finality toward resolving Vioxx cases in Canada for a fixed amount," said Bruce N. Kuhlik, executive vice president and general counsel of Merck. "Under the agreement, there will be an orderly, documented and objective process to examine individual claims to determine qualification."A company press release emphasized that Merck is not admitting any culpability in the case.“Merck continues to believe that the evidence shows the company acted responsibly with Vioxx,” the statement says, “ from the careful study in clinical trials involving about 10,000 patients before its approval by regulatory authorities around the world, through the careful safety monitoring while Vioxx was on the market, right up through the decision to voluntarily withdraw the medicine in September 2004.This agreement in Canada does not include any statement to the contrary and does not constitute any admission of liability.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Superhit News
-
US health regulator USFDA has issued a warning letter to German drug firm Fresenius Kabi AG for lapses at its drug manufacturing fac...
-
Goods and Service Tax (GST) is high on the agenda for the new government and its rollout is a priority. GST will benefit the Indian pharma...
-
Rib-X Pharmaceuticals, Inc. announced today the signature of an exclusive worldwide research collaboration agreement and option for license ...
-
Physiomics: Reports difficult trading but highlights growing interest from big pharmaceutical groupsPhysiomics ( LON:PYC ) said that trading conditions were difficult in the six months ended 31 December 2010, but it believes it is in a be...
-
Hindusthan National Glass and Industries Ltd is expected to finalize a strategic overseas acquisition in the pharmaceuticals space in the n...
-
The Minister of State (Health and Family Welfare), Sh Ashwini Kumar Choubey through a written reply in the Lok Sabha informed about th...
-
India's Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) has suspended the manufacturing of eye drops at the Chennai-based firm after...
-
The government is hoping to see the implementation of the track and trace system for domestic and export supply chain in another one y...
-
Diclofenac injection is a painkiller which is manufactured by Themis Medicare Ltd and marketed by Novartis India under the brand name ...
-
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. AMLN +16.15% and Alkermes plc ALKS +4.61% today announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has ...
No comments:
Post a Comment